dr hab. Barbara Baraniak
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, Warszawa

prof. dr hab. Andrzej Bogaj
Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego, Kielce

dr hab. Aleksander Marszałek, prof. URz
Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego

prof. dr hab. Nella Grigoriewna Nyczkało
Sekretarz Narodowej Akademii Nauk Pedagogicznych Ukrainy

prof. dr hab. Ryszard Parzęcki
Gdańska Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczna

dr hab. Bogusław Pietrulewicz, prof. UZ
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

Maria H. Rudowski
Délégation Académique à la Formation Professionnelle Initiale et Continue

dr hab. Adam Solak, prof. APS
Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa

dr hab. Franciszek Szlosek, prof. APS
Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa

dr Emilia Pecheanu
Uniwersytet "Dunarea de Jos" (UDJG), Galati, Rumunia

prof. dr hab. Ladislav Varkoly
Dubnický Technologický Inštitút v Dubnici, Słowacja

W szczególnych przypadkach członkowie Rady Programowej i Komitetu Naukowego


The procedure of reviewing articles is in accordance with recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in the publication “Good practice in review procedures in science”

  1. Preliminary analysis
    • Manuscripts, which have been sent, are submitted to a preliminary assessment by the editor-in-chief and thematic (section) editors. In the case when working papers are not in line with the journal profile they are sent back to their Authors.
    • The publications which have been initially accepted are subsequently given to the thematic editor who is responsible for the analysis and the organization of reviewing and editing process.
    • The editor-in-chief accepts the choice of at least two reviewers for each article. The choice of the reviewers must ensure their independent opinions, lack of the conflict of interest, which implies the lack of personal or professional relationships with the article’s Authors.
    • In the case of articles written in foreign languages at least one of the reviewers must be affiliated in a foreign institution other than the nationality of the working paper’s Author.
    • After having received the consent for the peer-review of articles, the journal secretary gives to the reviewers single articles, sets of articles of the planned section or even the whole ISSIUE with the review form.
  2. Reviewing
    • Reviewing in the „double-blind review process” system ensuring the confidentiality rules, within 30 days
    • The acceptance of the article for publication requires two positive opinions
    • The reviewer submits the review in a written or electronic form on the journal form. The review in the written form must conclude explicitly if the article should be admitted for the publication or rejected.
    • In case an article requires substantial changes in the reviewer’s opinion, the article corrected by the Author is submitted to another review to the same reviewer. In controversial / disputable cases, additional reviewers are appointed.
    • The reviewer’s name is confidential. It may be declassified (made known) upon the Author’s request and the reviewers’ consent.
  3. Cooperation with authors
    • Authors are informed about the review results and have access to them / may get acquainted with them.
    • Authors should revise the article to make corrections and send a corrected article within maximum 30 days..
  4. General
    • Once a year a complete reviewers’ directory is published in the journal
    • You are invited to send opinions, assessment of articles and of the journal to be posted online.
  5. Please find attached the review form in Polish and English. tel. +48 48 3644778
« top


Scientific-research quarterly
has been published since 1993
Circulation: 500 copies
Journal scored by The Ministry of
Science and Higher Education - 20 scores
Registered in The Central European
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (CEJSH)
Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Radomiu, Copyright ITeE, 2012